Understand the work
Use incumbents, supervisors, and archival data to identify real tasks, context, and KSAOs.
A systems-level redesign of a growing nonprofit’s work analysis, hiring, training, performance management, motivation, and team experience.
Academic organizational-design project · 2025Waste to Taste was created as a hypothetical global nonprofit confronting food waste and food insecurity. As the organization grew, its people systems failed to keep pace. Outreach workers faced outdated performance criteria, inconsistent hiring, administrative overload, burnout, and declining engagement.
I approached the assignment as one connected system rather than six isolated HR problems. If the organization misunderstood the work, every downstream decision would be weakened.
Use incumbents, supervisors, and archival data to identify real tasks, context, and KSAOs.
Replace unstructured judgment with job-relevant assessments and simulations.
Design equitable, phased training for a new volunteer-management platform.
Balance task results with contextual performance and volunteer feedback.
Examine workload, support, meaning, and the conditions surrounding performance.
Pilot, gather feedback, monitor outcomes, and refine across diverse regions.
The existing criteria captured only a narrow portion of outreach work. I proposed a mixed-method work analysis using surveys, supervisor interviews, and archival records, grounding the redesign in job-relevant tasks, contextual demands, and competencies.
I developed a multi-stage approach combining minimum-qualification screening, values and situational-judgment assessments, and behaviorally anchored simulations. Accessibility, cultural variation, interviewer bias, and reliability were treated as design requirements.
The proposed training combined self-paced learning, demonstrations, mastery checks, a soft transition period, office hours, and ongoing support. Measures included proficiency, turnaround time, and patterns in support requests.
Performance management had to recognize logistical outcomes and the relational, contextual work required to produce them. Otherwise, the organization’s people-first philosophy would remain symbolic.
“In short, the work analysis showed us that our people were not the problem, our systems were. This difficult truth showed us that our commitment to hiring from underserved populations was being undermined by a hiring system that couldn’t identify the specific competencies needed to thrive in this demanding role.”Excerpt · Predictors and assessments in hiring
The complete paper allows a visitor to examine the research, citations, writing, limitations, and full organizational argument behind this condensed case study.
A people-first value is only credible when it appears in the machinery of the organization: how work is defined, who gets selected, what support people receive, and what the organization chooses to recognize as good performance.